Mark Zuckerberg calls on employees to “make no apologies” for shortcomings in FB policy; here’s why
While Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg published a full page apology in several UK and US newspapers for the Facebook company ‘breach of trust’ in the Cambridge Analytica scandal, the tech CEO has now opted for the âno more excusesâ approach for the myriad recent charges and lawsuits. on company policies. According to a WSJ report, the social media mogul has asked his employees “not to apologize” for the flaws in Facebook’s policy as several US lawmakers in Washington called out the company over the revelation of whistleblower Frances Haugen on her company’s inability to regulate disinformation and the growing division online. , while discrediting the former employee.
The Facebook team in the District of Columbia instead reached out to Republicans, saying whistleblower Haugen is a Democratic activist seeking to bolster the ruling Democratic Party of US President Joe Biden. She joined forces with the opposition to disparage Meta’s image, the report said. Meta, which also operates Instagram and WhatsApp, also reportedly warned Democrats that their lawmakers would use Haugen’s testimony to question Facebook’s decision to restrict online posts and content related to Kenosha shooter Kyle Rittenhouse.
The 17-year-old from Antioch, Ill., Shot dead two men and injured another in Kenosha, Wis., During Kenosha’s protests against police brutality, but claimed he shot dead demonstrators in self-defense. He was, however, cleared of felony, manslaughter and reckless gun possession charges in connection with the Rosenbaum shooting.
An interesting change in Facebook’s strategy
Facebook’s recent move is an interesting shift in corporate strategy, and the report suggests it’s the dangerous PR management approach in which CEO Zuckerberg refuses to admit these shortcomings, far from correct them. Whereas previously Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg, the company’s chief operating officer, had promised to improve the company’s standards, they have now taken a tougher stance.
Facebook had drawn widespread backlash and criticism after a previously anonymous whistleblower, later identified as data scientist Francis Haugen, accused Zuckerberg of racking up public welfare profits. In an interview with investigative magazine “60 Minutes,” Haugen said Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg has always preferred his company’s interests and monetary gains over social evil.
âFacebook, time and time again, has shown it prefers profit over security,â said Haugen, who worked for the popular search engines Google and Pinterest before joining Facebook. She has reportedly filed at least eight complaints with federal law enforcement, releasing a wealth of confidential data and research showing how Facebook “exaggerates hatred and misinformation.” in order to oversee the gruesome policies of the social media giant allegedly detrimental to the well-being of society.
âI don’t believe they’re prepared to invest what needs to be invested to prevent Facebook from being dangerous,â Haugen said, accusing company CEO Zuckerberg of working on algorithms designed to promote hateful content and polarize democracies. While new Meta products have undergone reputation reviews, according to the WSJ report, CEO Zuckerberg has restricted internal access settings for research on topics related to mental health and radicalization for women. employees. This action may have been prompted to avoid any further leakage on the operation of the company.
Soon after, Facebook changed the name of the parent company to “Meta”. Sources told the WSJ that Zuckerberg asked all of his employees to communicate using “Metaverse” avatars to keep identities a secret. âThe implication is that Facebook should look to the future and not get bogged down in a messy past,â the report revealed, adding that the CEO was encouraging employees not to apologize and ignore the negative press. “When our work is distorted, we will not apologize. We will defend our record,” Facebook communicated to employees in early October, after the publication of internal documents, according to the newspaper, as legal. the repercussions have accumulated. Since then, at least four US Congressional hearings have taken place on issues raised by Haugen and a bipartisan coalition of state attorneys general has been formed to investigate the matter.